<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>brad nelson &#187; social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://b.radnelson.com/tag/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://b.radnelson.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 20:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Retweets 2.0 (aka, Your Tweets, retweeted) (Please RT this)</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/21/retweets-2-0-aka-your-tweets-retweeted-please-rt-this/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/21/retweets-2-0-aka-your-tweets-retweeted-please-rt-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This week I&#8217;ve been happily exploring the new retweet feature on Twitter.com. I can&#8217;t wait for this same functionality to spread to my favorite twitter clients. It&#8217;s accomplishing a better user experience for many reasons.

The integrity of the original tweet is saved (if you want to add comments, just send your own tweet)
You can easily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-422" title="Retweets" src="http://b.radnelson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-21-at-1.12.54-PM.png" alt="Retweets" width="547" height="52" /></p>
<p>This week I&#8217;ve been happily exploring the new retweet feature on Twitter.com. I can&#8217;t wait for this same functionality to spread to my favorite <a href="http://cotweet.com">twitter</a> <a href="http://www.atebits.com/tweetie-iphone/">clients</a>. It&#8217;s accomplishing a better user experience for many reasons.</p>
<ol>
<li>The integrity of the original tweet is saved (if you want to add comments, just send your own tweet)</li>
<li>You can easily measure how many times a tweet has been Retweeted</li>
<li>Measurement of overall influence on Twitter can be better calculated</li>
</ol>
<p>So, why the change? What&#8217;s next?</p>
<p>One of the biggest reasons I&#8217;m excited for it is the ability to measure overall reach by bringing it back to old school marketing numbers. Number of impressions. Why is that good? For people like me who run a brand twitter account and you get questions like, &#8220;what were the numbers on twitter today.&#8221; I say things like this, &#8220;We had 430 Retweets, and our share of voice on Twitter spiked to .2% (<a href="http://trendistic.com/starbucks">from .05-.1%</a>)&#8221;. This probably sounds like klingon to people who don&#8217;t use Twitter. Or I can say other things that mean less to me, but probably more to others, &#8220;We sent it to our 500,000 followers, I don&#8217;t know what they did with it.&#8221; With old school marketing numbers you can easily communicate more relevant data to your leadership team, and it makes it easier to validate the need for social media.</p>
<p><em>(side note: Yes, there are a lot of tools to calculate reach &amp; engagement, but I have yet to find one where I can both fully trust the data and translate it to an normalized number, like impressions.)</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a small, but an important step in Twitter&#8217;s maturation.</p>
<p>The new Retweet feature is going to allow precise measurement of how people are consuming tweets and what they&#8217;re doing with it next.</p>
<p>Now, what is the number one reason Twitter is doing this?</p>
<p><strong>Commercial accounts</strong>: Charge for information that isn&#8217;t available to anybody else. For example, this <a href="http://twitter.com/Starbucks/status/5871476931">tweet</a> went to 520,000 followers. The actual reach of that tweet was 3.73 million (just a guess) because it was Retweeted by these people.</p>
<p>Other reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>Old school IP (not <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Protocol">this</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property">this</a>)</li>
<li>Cleanliness of the interface</li>
<li>Standardization of a popular use case</li>
</ul>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see what Twitter, Inc. has in store next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/21/retweets-2-0-aka-your-tweets-retweeted-please-rt-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All media will be social, the term &#8216;Social Media&#8217; will be irrelevant &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/12/all-media-will-be-social-the-term-social-media-will-be-irrelevant/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/12/all-media-will-be-social-the-term-social-media-will-be-irrelevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New world online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FEED: The 2009 Razorfish Digital Brand Experience Report
They took a sample set of &#8216;connected customers&#8217; who are often leading indicators of how people interact digitally. There are a lot of great snippets of data that are worth reading through. Highly recommend.
Buzz Canuck: The Blindsiding and Bubble of Social Media
Key quote:
But in a very few short years,  my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FEED: <a href="http://feed.razorfish.com/">The 2009 Razorfish Digital Brand Experience Report</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">They took a sample set of &#8216;connected customers&#8217; who are often leading indicators of how people interact digitally. There are a lot of great snippets of data that are worth reading through. Highly recommend.</p>
<p>Buzz Canuck: <a href="http://buzzcanuck.typepad.com/agentwildfire/2009/11/the-blindsiding-and-bubble-of-social-media.html">The Blindsiding and Bubble of Social Media</a></p>
<p><a href="http://buzzcanuck.typepad.com/agentwildfire/2009/11/the-blindsiding-and-bubble-of-social-media.html"></a>Key quote:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>But in a very few short years,  my prediction &#8211; the term will fade into irrelevance &#8211; all media will be social &#8211; no more need for the distinction.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Twitter Census: <a href="http://blog.infochimps.org/2009/11/11/twitter-census-publishing-the-first-of-many-datasets/">Publishing the First of Many Datasets</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Infochimps has been scraping tweets for the last three years, and they have a dataset of information that is very hard to find. This is data that I would love to dig into. I&#8217;m positive that the amount of insights into every part of Starbucks (and digital society, really) would be astonishing. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see some interesting studies come out from this.</p>
<p>John Battelle&#8217;s Searchblog: <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/005057.php">Why Did Google Buy AdMob?</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">This post is to the point. Love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/12/all-media-will-be-social-the-term-social-media-will-be-irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crowd-Sourced Virtual Reality</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/11/crowd-sourced-virtual-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/11/crowd-sourced-virtual-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Month when I was in New York, my wife Andrea and I took a walk over the Brooklyn Bridge. I had my Canon Rebel xti and was snapping a bunch of photographs. About halfway through the walk, I realized just how many cameras were on the bridge at that time. Everyone had a camera, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Month when I was in New York, my wife Andrea and I took a walk over the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooklyn_Bridge">Brooklyn Bridge</a>. I had my Canon <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=139&amp;modelid=14256">Rebel xti </a>and was snapping a bunch of photographs. About halfway through the walk, I realized just how many cameras were on the bridge at that time. Everyone had a camera, and everyone was taking photos. It got me thinking.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be cool if two things were to happen &#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li>All cameras had a gps and a compass installed, just like your <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a>.</li>
<li>Sites that people upload photos to, such as Facebook and Flickr captured this data and utilized it in a smart way, with other data, like type of camera, lens, etc</li>
</ol>
<p>If you stitched those two things together, you know these things:</p>
<ul>
<li>Where someone is</li>
<li>What direction they&#8217;re facing</li>
<li>The type of camera + lens they&#8217;re using (already included with Flickr meta)</li>
</ul>
<p>You could build a crowd sourced, almost real time (if the photos were uploaded immediately), virtual reality video/time lapse video. For big tourist destinations, this could be amazing. For Sporting events, you could see a 360 view of the field. Big shared experiences could almost be recreated. What if you were then able to add location specific tweets into the mix.</p>
<p>Very much like <a href="http://gigapan.org/">GigaPan</a> or Microsoft <a href="http://photosynth.net/">Photosynth</a>, but entirely sourced from lots of different people and made into a virtual reality video.</p>
<p>&#8230; and ya, there are probably some privacy issues there.</p>
<p><em>Technology excites me.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/11/crowd-sourced-virtual-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Social media thoughts, November.</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/04/my-social-media-thoughts-november/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/04/my-social-media-thoughts-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to give my $.02 on where we are with Social Media at the beginning of November, 2009. About six months ago, I was pretty excited about two trends in social media; location based social networks and video.
The 3gs iPhone had just arrived, this meant two things to me:

Video on the best smartphone had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to give my $.02 on where we are with Social Media at the beginning of November, 2009. About six months ago, I was pretty excited about two trends in social media; location based social networks and video.</p>
<p>The 3gs iPhone had just arrived, this meant two things to me:</p>
<ol>
<li>Video on the best smartphone had arrived. It&#8217;s now very easy to publish video from whereever you are, without a computer.</li>
<li>The price of the 3G dropped to $99, cheaper than an iPhone has ever been. It has GPS, which means that a lot of users are going to be able to easily participate in a location based social network than before.</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m going to break these two apart, because they&#8217;re equally important:</p>
<p><strong>location based social networks</strong></p>
<p>Location based social networks is really important to me, now there is an easy and direct way to translate offline to online. As I find myself saying way too often, &#8220;you can make a latte on the internet&#8221;. Location based social networks are exciting because it is a tangible way to translate what someone is doing on their  device to what is around them in real life. Foursquare seemed to be the most exciting network then, and it&#8217;s done nothing but pick up <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/technology/internet/19foursquare.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=foursquare&amp;st=cse">steam</a>. Twitter has also stated that they&#8217;re <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/08/location-location-location.html">officially</a> adding location to tweets. I don&#8217;t believe that this will push <a href="http://www.playfoursquare.com">Foursquare</a> out at all. They still have quirky community that drives people to use the service as much as possible, because hey, I certainly don&#8217;t want to give up that mayorship anytime soon. Also, their database of crowdsourced locations is a great asset. Why buy the data, when you can get it for free?</p>
<p>Twitter&#8217;s location based info is really interesting because of it&#8217;s implication for search. Check out my thoughts on <a href="http://b.radnelson.com/2009/08/02/thoughts-on-trending-topics/" target="_blank">Twitter Trends based on location</a>.</p>
<p><strong>video</strong></p>
<p>This prediction isn&#8217;t coming true as quickly as I thought it would. Video on the web already had its coming out party with YouTube, mobile video isn&#8217;t having the same splash. I have been really impressed with how <a href="http://12seconds.tv">12Seconds</a> has built community within it&#8217;s site, I had been thinking that they might have a chance to break out with it. It&#8217;s looking like users in twitter aren&#8217;t as excited about about sharing mobile videos. I still think 12seconds has some opportunities, they just aren&#8217;t as obvious as I thought they were 6 months ago.</p>
<p>It makes me wonder if social media, while being social, is still an inherently solitary act. Even if you&#8217;re tweeting in a large group, it&#8217;s still solitary. It&#8217;s just you and the iPhone screen. When you share a video online, the barrier starts to break down, and it starts to feel more invasive to the process.</p>
<p>Before the year is over, I&#8217;ll pen my thoughts on what&#8217;s coming for the next 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/11/04/my-social-media-thoughts-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Lists, why you should care</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/10/31/twitter-lists-why-you-should-care/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/10/31/twitter-lists-why-you-should-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lists on Twitter launched to everyone this week. A lot of people are very excited this, for very good reason. Some are even saying that it might be the biggest thing to hit Twitter in a while. I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic. It&#8217;s not going to matter to me until the my favorite twitter clients (cotweet, tweetie) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-378" title="TwitterLists" src="http://b.radnelson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Screen-shot-2009-10-31-at-2.30.53-PM.png" alt="TwitterLists" width="554" height="327" />Lists on Twitter launched to everyone this week. A lot of people are very excited this, for very good reason. Some are even saying that it might be the biggest thing to hit Twitter in a while. I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic. It&#8217;s not going to matter to me until the my favorite twitter clients (cotweet, tweetie) adopt the functionality. It is worth watching closely now, though. Hopefully this is the beginning of some great functionality to come out of Twitter, Inc. Maintaining users with new features should be one of their top priorities right now. Numbers have come out lately to show that usage has been flat over the last 3 months. It&#8217;s not the easiest service for someone to use, and hopefully this will go a short ways towards making it easier. I know many people who have opened Twitter accounts only to see what the fuss is about, only to not understand it and go somewhere else (see: Facebook). This is a big deal for Twitter. They haven&#8217;t fully implemented a ton of new functionality in the last year, as they&#8217;ve spent most of the time stabilizing the service. Of course there have been some sublte tweeks here and there.</p>
<p>Like a lot of things in life, it&#8217;s turning into another popularity contest. &#8220;Ohh, I&#8217;m on 3,746 lists! thanks everyone&#8221; is a Tweet I&#8217;ve been seeing a lot lately. Twitter obviously wants Lists to become a big thing, otherwise they wouldn&#8217;t have placed it so prominently within the page. Regardless, this will be another interesting metric to watch on someone&#8217;s page next to number of tweets, and the following-follower ratio.</p>
<p>Here are some lists that I&#8217;ll probably be making and watching:</p>
<ul>
<li>Start unfollowing people that you don&#8217;t want to read every day, but are still interested in what they have to say every now and then.</li>
<li>If you manage a brand account, you probably follow lots of other brands on Twitter to keep an eye on what they&#8217;re doing. You can now make a tidy list to watch them on.</li>
<li>Organize your lists by where you meet someone or what they mostly talk about, if you like, you can keep your list private to be more descriptive. Did you meet them at a conference, local event, introduced by a mutual friend? Are they into music, technology or</li>
</ul>
<p>Facebook&#8217;s had lists for sometime. I haven&#8217;t spent the time to organize it in quite some time, so it&#8217;s not even worth using right now. I think with the introduction of Twitter Lists, I might revisit it and try it out again, though.</p>
<p>The api is going to be fun. I already have some super secret ideas on how to use it for the @Starbucks Twitter account.</p>
<p>Can we fast forward to the future when the good apps have fully implemented it and the API is available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/10/31/twitter-lists-why-you-should-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signal to Noise on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/10/10/signal-to-noise-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/10/10/signal-to-noise-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New world online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple weeks ago I sat on a panel at 140tc that was moderated by Guy Kawasaki about brand building on Twitter. There was a lot of great insight by all the panelists, and I had a great time in the conversation. However, there were a couple of disagreements that I wanted to elaborate on.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="Speaking on the panel" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3499/3951988500_9810624682_m.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="160" />A couple weeks ago I sat on a panel at <a href="http://140tc.com">140tc</a> that was moderated by <a href="http://twitter.com/guykawasaki">Guy Kawasaki</a> about brand building on Twitter. There was a lot of great insight by all the panelists, and I had a great time in the conversation. However, there were a couple of disagreements that I wanted to elaborate on.</p>
<p>The last two weeks have been filled with a lot of traveling. I also don&#8217;t get cable at home, so I generally have cable TV on in the background in hotel rooms. I get my fill, and it&#8217;s decent background noise. When I go home, I don&#8217;t miss it. Some were making the point that cable news is a good place to emulate for how to tweet. Repeat the same message many times over the day to make sure you get it across. There are many great tools available to get this done, so technically, it&#8217;s no problem.<br />
<img class="alignright" title="The panel" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2437/3951209343_b6c90d5065_m.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="160" /><br />
However, I have a problem with this. To me, it feels like it&#8217;s fighting noise with noise. Eventually everyone is going to go twitter-deaf (<em>twideaf?</em>) and unfollow you from the amount of redundant tweets. I personally try to keep my number of followers kind of low on Twitter. It makes it easier to actually get to know people, which is what I&#8217;m interested in. I&#8217;m sure that if I followed more people, I would have built up a bigger following base. Which is great, but that is tertiary to what my actual goal on twitter is;<em> have great conversations with great people and learn something every now and then.</em> This use case on Twitter is not conducive to brands that counter noise with more noise. I&#8217;m far more interested in real conversations with real people, quality always trumps quantity.</p>
<p>The conversation on the panel was top notch, and I&#8217;m thankful I was asked to participate.</p>
<p><strong>Anyway, here&#8217;s the panel, in it&#8217;s entirety:</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="220" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6874651&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="220" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6874651&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/6874651">Growing Your Brand on Twitter: Strategies and Tactics From the Trenches</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user2008341">Parnassus Group</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/10/10/signal-to-noise-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Road</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/09/20/on-the-road/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/09/20/on-the-road/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road trip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I&#8217;ve always wanted to drive across the country. I figured it would be to either visit all the major league baseball stadiums, or to follow Phish. Never thought I would be doing it for my job. Two weeks ago I found out I&#8217;d be spending the last two weeks of September with 10 strangers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-333" title="The_road" src="http://b.radnelson.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/IMG_1163_backofcar1-150x150.jpg" alt="The_road" width="150" height="150" /> I&#8217;ve always wanted to drive across the country. I figured it would be to either visit all the major league baseball stadiums, or to follow Phish. Never thought I would be doing it for my job. Two weeks ago I found out I&#8217;d be spending the last two weeks of September with 10 strangers filming a series of webisodes. I was worried about a couple things at the beginning:</p>
<ol>
<li>Would the other people be fun? Told myself that I can do anything for two weeks, but still &#8230; two weeks is a long time to spend with people you don&#8217;t know.</li>
<li>I&#8217;ve never spent much time in front of the camera, would it be fun?</li>
<li>Will I be away from the internet for too long and cause withdrawals?</li>
</ol>
<p>The answers are turning out as follows; <em>incredibly so, affirmative, 3g usb cards &#8211; ftw.</em></p>
<p>The first two days were spent in Seattle, Vancouver, and Bellevue. I did not feel like I was on a road trip. It was just an odd trip. The third day we made the trek to Montana, and it definitely started feeling like we were going to actually drive across the country. My original plans for road tripping involved lots of camping and couches. I&#8217;m fairing much better with couches and wifi.</p>
<p>For the most part, only Erin and I are on the camera, but it truly takes an army of smart dedicated people to put it together. When we started, I thought I might have to actually do some driving. Fortunately, we have four of the coolest drivers that are complete road veterans schlepping us and our coffee around. We should do an episode on the radio banter, exclusively. It&#8217;s hilarious.</p>
<p>Traveling with comedians is <em>really</em> fun.</p>
<p>Tomorrow I&#8217;m flying to LA to speak at <a href="http://140tc.com">140tc</a>, I&#8217;ll meet up with the road trip in Nebraska on Wednesday. Then it&#8217;s Chicago, Erie, Boston, and NYC.</p>
<p>You can follow the road trip on <a href="http://twitter.com/StarbucksLive">Twitter</a> or watch the videos on <a href="http://youtube.com/Starbucks">YouTube</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/09/20/on-the-road/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Trending Topics</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/08/02/thoughts-on-trending-topics/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/08/02/thoughts-on-trending-topics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 05:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter&#8217;s Trending Topics is one of the reasons that Twitter has become so successful. Revealing the public consensus to the simple question of &#8220;what are you doing?&#8221; is one of the most enjoyable parts of being a part of Twitter. When my favorite band, my favorite baseball team, or my favorite coffee company show up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter&#8217;s Trending Topics is one of the reasons that Twitter has become so successful. Revealing the public consensus to the simple question of &#8220;what are you doing?&#8221; is one of the most enjoyable parts of being a part of Twitter. When my favorite band, my favorite baseball team, or my favorite coffee company show up on the list, it&#8217;s really exciting. I&#8217;ll spend some time reading everybody&#8217;s responses for a little while, and perhaps even add my own commentary. It turns into a global discussion on a single topic. Once a word, phrase, or hashtag shows up there, it only catapults it to more discussion.</p>
<p>Like all good things in life, if they&#8217;re accessible enough, it&#8217;ll be taken over by people that aren&#8217;t necessarily looking to do good or have a thoughtful discussion. At it&#8217;s best, the stupid hashtags show up, such as #threewordsaftersex or #musicmonday, at it&#8217;s worst, spammers leech onto existing hashtags and just use it to get into people&#8217;s search, w/out being relevant to the discussion. Long term, this is the equivalent of MySpace&#8217;s irritating ads. Untargeted and distracting. As this becomes more frequent or targeted, this could be a reason that Twitter loses relevance.</p>
<p>Twitter has a big opportunity to turn Trending Topics into Trending Topics based on user criteria. The useful areas for me are in the following areas:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Follower list</strong>: What are my friends talking about? How about their friends that I don&#8217;t know (friends, plus once removed)?</li>
<li><strong>Location</strong>: What are people in Seattle, WA (my hometown) talking about?</li>
<li><strong>Interests</strong>: What are trumpet players (my instrument) talking about? How about other motorcyclists? Or others that work in Social Media?</li>
</ul>
<p>I like to think that my beer drinking friends are smarter than your beer drinking friends. With this, you could have 3 or so different lists of trending topics. All of which could be opt-in if you decide. However, I don&#8217;t work for Twitter Inc, so it&#8217;s not my job to say how they should do this. Regardless, the need for a middle layer of relevance between Facebook/Twitter status updates and the greater world&#8217;s Trending Topics exists.</p>
<p>This could get really interesting. Twitter biggest strength right now is the collection of data detailing what people are thinking about right now. If they want to become the central place for global consciousness, it&#8217;s going to need to become more granular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/08/02/thoughts-on-trending-topics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Analog Tweeting</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/07/24/virtual-analog-tweeting/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/07/24/virtual-analog-tweeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just commenting this week how people hide behind Twitter. I&#8217;ve never seen anybody yell #FAIL at a business or person in real life, but they tweet that all the time.
This is some funny stuff:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just commenting this week how people hide behind Twitter. I&#8217;ve never seen anybody yell <em>#FAIL</em> at a business or person in real life, but they tweet that all the time.</p>
<p>This is some funny stuff:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tTN9We8unmU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tTN9We8unmU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/07/24/virtual-analog-tweeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>location, location, location</title>
		<link>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/07/17/location-location-location/</link>
		<comments>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/07/17/location-location-location/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New world online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://b.radnelson.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the future of location based social networking? Location is the most important part of real estate and in baseball it&#8217;s the difference between a Cy Young award winner and a minor leaguer. It&#8217;s also something that is making it&#8217;s way to most mobile phones and conceivably laptop computers someday. The benefits are vast, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the future of location based social networking? Location is the most important part of real estate and in baseball it&#8217;s the difference between a Cy Young award winner and a minor leaguer. It&#8217;s also something that is making it&#8217;s way to most mobile phones and conceivably laptop computers someday. The benefits are vast, and benefit all sorts of users; including regular people, advertisers, gov&#8217;t intelligence officials, and stalkers, all in very different ways. Some benefits are pretty damn cool, some are pretty damn scary.</p>
<p>There are many sides of the equation, such as; i have friends and i want to see what they&#8217;re doing, maybe I&#8217;ll hang out with them right now, i&#8217;m a stalker and i want to be a creep, i&#8217;m a gov&#8217;t and i want to follow my citizens, and i&#8217;m an advertiser and i want to spend my money wisely with smart call to actions. All sides need to be addressed for the location based social web to take off, which it will someday.</p>
<p>Existing location based social web apps exist for the iphone right now. All of them have their advantages, some range from neat story-telling with people you don&#8217;t know at the place that you&#8217;re at, see where my friends are now, play a game based on the location, or see what else is around me. I like all of them for different reasons. I hate all of them because whenever I use them there is no benefit to me. None of my friends are on there, at least the ones that live in my city that I hang out with. It&#8217;s only a matter of time.</p>
<p>These social networks are going to take off this way, by focusing on shared experiences and shared events where a lot of tech savvy people are going to be present and leveraging existing mature social networks for promotion. Facebook and Twitter are great, but the problems they need to focus on are very different from the features that these location based networks are focused on. It&#8217;s a big area of opportunity. Hashtags are great on Twitter, but they aren&#8217;t the final answer.</p>
<p>This is going to be a fun area of the internet to pay attention to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://b.radnelson.com/2009/07/17/location-location-location/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
